|
Page 37
I had to try the new stainless steel mini tank. Like I said, it was more harsh. I believe it is only due to the excess stainless steel in the tank. It is larger than the nano tank. Other than the size difference, it operates the same and seems to be a good tank.((edit) The mini and the nano both use the same coils, but I do have a complaint with the mini, this is in regards to the older mini that is a bottom fill unit, when I go to refill it, it always seems to flood. I don't have that problem with the nano. The flooding isn't too bad of an issue, just blow out into a napkin then problem solved, but it is annoying. Maybe the new top fill tanks won't have the same problem.)It is better suited to the joye or mini vapes due to the size. It really looks super cool on the platinum KBOX mini though.(edit) final conclusion with the bottom fill mini: it is unacceptable, defective. After trying different coils, non-stop flooding and other problems. It only seemed to work decent with the 0.5 ohm coils, but still flooded badly every refill. the good news: Kanger replaced it with a top fill model, and so far, it appears to have eliminated the problems of the bottom fill unit.Update: some good news, I tried the RBA that came with my mini kit and it works great. It is a game changer for it. It makes the old mini very usable. I suppose this is why the ratings were so good, the RBA. No leaking or gurgling with the RBA.
On New Year's Eve I decided to pull out my stash and mix some premium e-cannabis oil. I wanted to try it with my favorite tank, the black subtank nano, with the 0.5 ohm coil. This thing should have a warning label on it! The expando is unbelievable! You must be real careful, you won't know until it is too late. The buzz is the same, very extreme.
Then I decided to put the subox nano tank onto the KBOX mini platinum vape. They work the same for the most part
So far, the best vaping experience I have had would have to be with the KangerTech SUBOX nano and Topbox mini.
I can't wait to try the 0.15 ohm coils....
Jan 09 2016
I want to share my current two favorite stores to shop at for my vaporizing equipment.
At this time, these seem to have the best prices and newest, updated equipment.
Jan 22 2016 07:11 PM
Feb 14 2016
Have no fear! KangerTech nano skirts are here!
For all you guys and girls stuck with getting a box mod in a color that is undesirable to you, a potential solution has been found! It would also serve as added protection to your box mod.
Kangertech Subox NANO 50W Protective Gel Skin Case Cover Sleeve
Feb 27 2016
Just finished testing KangerTech's new Topbox tanks. I got the topbox nano and topbox mini.
The new topbox nano is a little shorter than the original nano tank. It is more convenient being top fill. Not sure if I like it better or not, I think I do. Both nano tanks are great. My only complaint with the topbox nano is the red gaskets. I am sure they can be replaced with black gaskets though.
As for the topbox mini, a major upgrade for sure. The original mini tank, well, I considered that junk. The new top fill mini is awesome. It does not leak or flood, has much better airflow. The stainless steel model offers good taste. You can get the whole topbox mini kit for $49 at certain retailers. The platinum version is more expensive and not as easy to get, they sell out quickly.
With the new top fill design, I like both the nano and mini just the same.
It is difficult for me to try some of the new tanks like the Arctic, and others that appear to be very impressive. I hesitate to try them because they will not satisfy my e-cigg use, they only offer sub ohm coils. I like my vaporizer to do both sub ohm and standard ohm so I can use them for both cannabis oil and e-cigg oils.
The only downside with the 1.5 ohm coils is the cotton is more tightly packed. A new coil gives a burnt taste for about a half tank of juice. After that, it just keeps getting better and they last a long time. I would say it is worth the hassle of breaking them in. I have not experienced this issue with the sub ohm coils.
Continued on Page 38 . . .
|
