|
Page 9
Jan 18 2014
 I mentioned previously about trying to make the oil safer for long term use. Whether you extract with grain alcohol or re-purge with grain alcohol, or winterize with grain alcohol, I believe it to be much safer. Since I have been using the grain alcohol, it has made me feel more comfortable and has removed any doubt of the safety of my product knowing there are no toxic residues behind.
All I am willing to use to make my RSO is either 99% isopropyl alcohol or 190 proof or higher grain alcohol. Now that is a problem for us in Michigan. Many out of state stores that have 190 proof or higher alcohol will not ship into Michigan. This place will, Wine Chateau, and they have quite a large selection of alcohol too. I have removed the link to Wine Chateau, I got ripped off by them. First, they did not give me the items that I ordered, just gave me an equivalent without notifying me. To top it off, the 190 proof Everclear was not authentic, it was at best 100 proof and watered down with sugar water. I asked where they get their product and they get it through a wholesaler (middle man). I no longer trust this company and will no longer use Everclear. I have found something better.
I have used this stuff and have never had a problem with it. http://www.malloysfi.../sku103032.html
If you would like to learn more about this experience I have been documenting conversations between me and Wine Chateau as well as Luxco (the Everclear bottling company).
Pictured above is a 1 liter bottle of 190 Everclear and a 5th of 192 proof Polish Vodka. When I get around to it I will do a re-purge with the same oil using each alcohol to see if there is any difference in the aftertaste between the two alcohols. Of course I will have to sample it in the vaporizer as well! The effects of different taste with the alcohol should be most noticeable with the vaporizer if there is any difference at all.
A good thing about purging with grain alcohol is that it does not stink as bad and does not seem nearly as fumy as the 99% iso. I would have to say it is much safer especially when it comes to breathing the fumes.
Apr 12 2014
The following is from two separate cancer families in regards to modern treatments for cancer. I am keeping their names anonymous for respect of their privacy. However, some names will be mentioned from outside sources.
A message and other information from family #1
I have the "conspiracy theory" attitude anymore. I'm certain that the pharma companies along with whoever else makes money from the suppression of real medicine, is involved in making sure this plant stays illegal. There's no doubt in my mind that if hemp oil cures cancer it is a major threat to them and they will suppress it with all their might/money. It's sickening how corrupt and evil medicine has become. I have such a hard time dealing with the docs and their bs because I don't believe anything they say anymore. They know it too.
A post and letter drafted after the death of their son.
August 11
This is our story of our son's battle with and ultimate loss to osteosarcoma/side effects of treatment. It's our experience with the oncologists and other docs that "treated" him. You don't have to agree with anything we've said, we don't care. But we do hope you have been made aware that there's a huge risk in using chemotherapy and that it may not work leaving little or no real treatment options. Pediatric oncologists have been using the same chemical warfare that has been (mostly) unsuccessful for too many years. The real question is why? Why after billions of dollars invested in finding the "cure", are we no closer to it? Follow the money trail- who has the most to lose if chemo is replaced? Who has the most invested in the current protocols? Who funds most of the research? Find the answers to these questions and you will see what and who is preventing any real progress. Btw, oncologists make money from the chemo they prescribe so consider them more than a little biased. Also know that a recent poll of oncologist said that over 85% of them WOULD NOT do chemo if they had cancer. What does that tell you?
Dear Doctors, September 20, 2013
It has been over a month that our son died. The end of his more than two year ordeal with cancer and cancer treatments you prescribed have left us angry and wondering why you didn't do more to help him.
The hospital you work for is supposed to offer some of the most up-to-date, state-of-the-art comprehensive pediatric cancer care in the United States. Yet our son and most of the boys our son roomed with early on, have died of their disease or the treatment side effects. The statistic of 75% cure rate you quoted us in terms of your success in treating our son’s cancer cannot possibly be accurate, based on what we have seen. The vast amount of money used to build the new, beautiful Mott's Children's Hospital did little to improve survival of the patients it was built to treat. This money should have been spent on developing something that actually works.
The overall lack of compassion and options available to our son became obvious once his cancer had returned. After all he had been through, and what was recommended, your treatments failed and he was sent home to die. The last week of his life was spent in agonizing pain that could not be controlled by drugs. We repeatedly contacted the surgeons office and Palliative Care Team in an effort to look at surgery for pain control. It wasn't until we contacted the Ethics group that a surgeon contacted us. We were told he would look at options and let us know. We never heard back from him.
The hospice doctor also suggested we contact the surgeons to inquire about palliative surgical intervention as the amount of pain medication required for only a few moments of relief was at a dangerous level- 12 mg of dilaudid hourly and 60 mg of Methadone a day. Dangerous indeed as our son died from these medications in the early morning of August 3, 2013. Perhaps you think this is a blessing but I challenge you to put your son, daughter or loved one in this situation and decide what a blessing it is. You can't imagine the agony we all suffered as a family as we watched our son die a horribly painful death. Do you not care?
The only positive feedback we can offer is that the nursing staff at Mott's is exemplary. In particular PICU and the 7th floor nurses are some of the best and caring we have encountered.
In closing we don't blame you for our son's cancer. But we do hold you accountable for the lack of safe and effective treatment options and for the misery our son suffered at the end of his life. This is your job, you get paid to treat cancer. Why do you not advocate on behalf of your patients and demand better treatments? Why are you not outraged for your patients at the consistent failure of the current protocols used? Why are you still prescribing the same failure-laden protocols? Why has nothing changed in the treatment of sarcoma in over 50 years? How is it that you still get paid when your treatments fail and children die? What is your incentive to improve outcomes when you are paid handsomely regardless of outcome? These are reasonable questions that need to be addressed.
We put our faith, trust and our son's life in your hands. Ultimately he is gone because of your failure as oncologists and team members to provide safe and effective cancer treatment. We would have thought better from the University of Michigan Hospitals.
Continued on Page 10 . . .
|
